It was the military bureaucracy system of the Mughals established by the Akbar.
That is officials had dual functions of civil and military functions.
Mansab is a post/office and Mansabdar is the holder or occupant of Mansabs.
There were two types of Mansbdars on basis of the mode of salary.
Naqadi Mansabdar:
They were paid a salary in cash.
Jagirdar Mansabdar:
They were paid in the form of allocating a Jagir.
The land revenue from the Jagirs (land) went to the Jagirdar.
Jagir is a land whose land revenue goes to Jagirdar and Jagirdar is the holder of Jagir.
hey were paid a salary in cash.
Jagirdar Mansabdar:
They were paid in the form of allocating a Jagir.
The land revenue from the Jagirs (land) went to the Jagirdar.
Jagir is a land whose land revenue goes to Jagirdar and Jagirdar is the holder of Jagir.
Jagir was of two types:
Tankha Jagirs:
These jagirs could be transferred from one to another Mansabdar(could be taken away from the Mansabdar by the king).
All of the revenue goes to Mansabdar.
Vatan Jagirs:
The word Vatan means hereditary.
It was given permanently to a person and becomes heredity Jagir.
It is non-transferable.
10% of land revenue from Vatan Jagir went to the king as tribute/Peshkash.
As here king gave up the right to take away Jagir, therefore needs to
be compensated and tribute acted as Vatan Jagirdar recognizing the
sovereign authority of the king.
The criteria for becoming Mansabdar was lineage(family background).
Every Mansabdar had a dual rank.
Zat:
It was a personal Rank.
Sawar:
It is the number of Horsemen a Mansabdar is required to Maintain for the king.
For example- Zat=3000 and Sawar=1500 then net rank=4500.
The emoluments of Mansabadar were equal to his salary and allowance for the maintenance of the army as per his Sawar.
More important nobles were Jagirdar Mansabdar and less important ones were Naqadi Mansabdars.
Vatan Jagirs were given to those who were very powerful Mansabdars.
Corrupt Mansabadar would not maintain an army as per Sawar, therefore
would try to make personal, money to be ideally spent on the army or
over-extracted land revenue from Jagir.
Mughal emperors are dependent on Mansabdars for the Maintainance of the army.
therefore in the Mansabdari system, a give-and-take relationship existed between the king and Mansabdar.
The king gave Mansab and Jagir and in return Mansabdar gave his loyalty and maintained the army of the king.
Therefore there existed personal loyalty and if the king does not give
the desired Mansabs and Jagirs then it may lead to disloyalty towards
the king.
0 Comments