BACKGROUND OF MODERN CONCEPTS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
- The Treaty of Westphalia signed in 1648, created the framework for modern international relations.
- The concepts of state sovereignty, nation-state, diplomacy, etc. all find their origins in the text of this treaty.
Economical determinant of Foreign Policy:
- Foreign policy is formulated to achieve the economic goals of the country.
- The biggest example was the new economic policy in 1992.
- Not only India came out of the Hindu Growth Rate, but India went on the path to becoming a global power.
- India emerged as an unquestioned regional hegemon with its role in the partition of Pakistan and the creation of an independent Bangladesh.
- However, India could not climb the ladder of the global power hierarchy with regular and substantive GDP growth rates.
| After USSR collapsed, much of the Soviet nuclear warheads were with Ukraine which Ukraine chose to surrender to Russia. Had Ukraine not taken this step, the present conflict would have been very different. |
Military determinant of foreign policy:
- It was post-operation Shakti that India became a de facto Nuclear Weapon State( NWS).
- It is only after it, India emerged as an important global power and India could enter into a strategic partnership with the USA.
- Today, the defense has emerged as the primary pillar of cooperation in India- USA ties.
Historical determinant of Foreign Policy:
- India's history of colonialism makes it an ardent( strong) supporter of anti-colonial movements in Africa and Asia.
- India-Pakistan relations continue to be impacted by the bitter history of partition.
- So much so that we are at times referred to as brother enemies.
India & the neighborhood:
- Good relations among neighboring countries are important because:
- I. Peace & Security.
- II. To promote trade & commerce.
- III. To check the role of external powers in the region.
- IV. To sustain India's claim to the permanent seat of UNSC.
Some important statements in this context:
- Atal Bihari Vajpayee- ' One can choose one's friends but neighbors have to live together'.
- Dr. Manmohan Singh- ' The real test of a country's foreign policy is handling of its neighborhood.
- Narendra Modi- 'A nation's destiny is linked to its neighborhood'.
GUJARAL'S DOCTRINE
- It emphasizes the principle of non-reciprocity.
- India will do whatever it can in good faith for the neighboring countries without expecting equal factors from them.
- India would desist from emphasizing the transactional nature of relations.
- The only requirement is that the neighboring countries (except Pakistan) should not allow the misuse of their territory against India or other South Asian countries.
- It is a set of five principles that combines the principle of reciprocity with the five Pancsheel principles.
Panchsheel: They are the five principles of peaceful coexistence to govern relations between states, first used in respect of China. They include:
|
Relevance of Gujaral Doctrine:
- It would help in checking the big-power small-power syndrome.
- The syndrome arises due to the huge size asymmetry -in terms of geography, population, Economics & Military between India and its neighbors.
- As a consequence of which, the neighboring countries remain suspicious of Indian actions.
- The doctrine will help in countering the Indian image of a bullying big brother.
- It would limit the scope of growing Chinese influence in the region.
- it would strengthen the Indian claim as a regional and consequently global superpower.
Neighbourhood First Policy:
- It was adopted in 2014 by the Modi government.
- It has four tenets:
- I. Diplomatic & Political priority will be extended to the neighboring countries.
- II. To provide in terms of resources for their development.
- III. To facilitate connectivity to allow the free flow of goods, services, investments, and ideas.
- IV. To promote a model of India-led regionalism with which the neighboring countries are comfortable.
- The policy implementation could be seen indirectly through many steps like inviting leaders of SAARC nations for the 2014 swearing-in and inviting BIMSTEC leaders for the 2019 swearing-in.
INDIA-PAKISTAN RELATIONS
- Probable questions:
- I.Comment on the India-Pakistan conundrum. How can India manage its relations with Pakistan?
- II. Though the Indus Water Treaty is the most successful river-water treaty in the world, India has given a call for its revision. Discuss the reasons for the same.
- III. Examine the use of terrorism as a tool of foreign policy by Pakistan. Analyze its ramifications for Islamabad.
Introduction:
- India and Pakistan are referred to as brother enemies.
- They have fought three full-fledged wars and one limited war.
- The 1948 war concluded with Karachi Agreement- the UN drew the Ceasefire line between India and Pakistan.
- The 1965 war concluded with Tashkent Agreement.
- The 1971 war concluded with Shimla Agreement.
- The 1999 Kargil War was a limited war.
1971 war:
- India did not initiate the war as the war was caused due to the internal situations between East Pakistan and West Pakistan.
- India was forced to intervene after India faced an influx of around 10 million refugees.
- The war was one of the quickest and most decisive wars in modern history.
- Within a few weeks of Indian participation, India won with more than 80,000 prisoners of war and Bangladesh was created.
- The magnitude of loss made Pakistan realize that they could not match India in a conventional war.
- Pakistan then started to focus on limited conflicts, border incursions, terrorism, etc. which is overall referred to as Bleeding India with a Thousand Cuts.
- Pakistan started to get nuclear weapons to decrease the power difference and gain strategic parity with India.
- Hence, the 1971 defeat was a watershed movement in Pakistani defense and foreign policy.
Shimla Agreement 1972:
- The Ceasefire line (Karachi Agreement was renamed as the Line of Control.
- Bilateral disputes were to be resolved through bilateral mechanisms without any third-party involvement.
India-Pakistan relations conundrum:
- India's intractable rivalry with Islamabad is India's Islamabad Conundrum.
- Despite every Indian PM personally paying high attention to India-Pakistan relations, the relations have followed a Dialogue-Disruption-Dialogue cycle.
- Whenever a government in India pursues dialogue for the normalization of India-Pakistan relations, such a dialogue is disrupted by either war or a terrorist attack.
Reasons:
- There is a presence of vested interests against the normalization of India-Pakistan relations.
- The vested interests include:
- I. Deep State:
- The reason for such power of the Pakistani army lies in bitter India-Pakistan relations.
- II. Jihadi Elements:
- Their Raison De Atre (reason for existence) lies in conflict with India.
Evidences of Dialogue-Disruption-Dialogue Cycle:
- Example 1:
- India and Pakistan became de-facto nuclear states in 1998.
- The Lahore Bus Diplomacy took place in 1999 when the then-Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee traveled from Delhi to Lahore.
- It resulted in Lahore Declaration and we got the statement-
- The peace was disrupted by the Kargil War/Misadventure.
- Both India and Pakistan were juvenile nuclear powers and still Pakistan chose to go for nuclear brinksmanship.
- Pakistan took the risk of self-destruction, just to test Indian resolve and Indian capacity to retaliate.
Example 2:
- Agra Summit 2001- Pakistan accepted terrorism as a bilateral issue.
- The momentum was derailed in October 2001- An attack on Srinagar Assembly and later in December 2001- An attack on the Indian Parliament.
Example 3:
- India-Pakistan began the composite dialogue in 2004 under the 2+6 framework.
- The framework included discussing 2 major issues( Terrorism by India and Kashmir by Pakistan) and discussing 6 minor issues(low-hanging fruits).
- The six issues included Sir Creek, Siachin Glacier, Wular Lake (source of Jhelum), etc.
- The progress was disrupted by the 26/11 terrorist attacks in Mumbai in 2008.
Example 4:
- Pakistani PM was invited along with other SAARC leaders for the swearing-in ceremony of the newly formed Council of Ministers.
- 2015- Cricket Diplomacy, Surprise Visit to Lahore.
- The enthusiasm ended after attacks on Indian military bases- Gurdaspur(2015), Pathankot(January 2016), and Uri (September 2016).
- After the Indian realist response, Pakistan retaliated with the Pulwama attack(February 2019).
- After the Uri attack, India conducted a publicized surgical strike.
- After the Pulwama attack, India conducted an air strike inside Pakistani territory.
- The action was referred to by India as Non-military Pre-Emptive & Retaliatory Airstrike aimed at Jaish-E-Mohhamd installations.
- After the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu & Kashmir into two Union Territories, India-Pakisatn relations are believed to have entered a state of deep freeze.
FEATURES OF THE DEEP-FREEZE PERIOD
- High-level political exchanges were suspended.
- The 2015 Lahore visit by PM Modi is the last high-level bilateral interaction between the two countries.
- Trade was suspended.
- India withdrew from Most Favored Nation (MFN) status after the Pulwama attack while Pakistan imposed prohibitive taxes to discourage imports from India.
- Diplomatic missions were downgraded, the respective high commissioners were recalled and the mission strength was reduced to half.
- Cultural and sports exchanges were canceled.
- The opening of the Kartarpur Corridor was an exception.
- Severe LOC cross-border firings.
The current state of bilateral relations:
- The relations are in a state of cold peace.
- Since the two countries renewed the LOC ceasefire agreement in February 2021.
- The backchannel NSA-level dialogues are believed to be a reason for some renewal of dialogue.
FEATURES OF THIS COLD PEACE
- Minimal bilateral contacts.
- Bilateral contacts are bilateral, tactical, and clinical.
- The contacts are limited to urgent bilateral issues which need immediate action.
- there is no political will for any grand relationship gesture and any political outreach by two countries.
Why the cold peace?:
- We realize the fact that no bilateral issue has been resolved after the 1960s.
- The last major resolved issue was Indus river-water sharing.
- so there is no incentive to put in diplomatic efforts.
- India now believes in deterrence by punishment.
- Pakistan claims to have developed tactical nuclear weapons- nuclear weapons which can be used in actual wartime and cause localized damage.
- India has focussed more on developing strategic nuclear weapons- which can cause large-scale damage aimed at totally destroying the enemy.
- India has wanted to pursue/launch a conventional attack in case of a sub-conventional attack by Pakistan- terrorist attacks.
- India was stopped from pursuing the same because of fear of Pakistan resorting to the use of tactical nuclear weapons.
- India fears that any such conventional response by India could spiral into a nuclear war between the two countries.
- Especially since Pakistan is an irrational actor.
- However, the Balakot air strike is thought to have called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff.
- Both face different geo-political issues.
- India is engaged with border issues with China.
- Pakistan is tackling severe economic issues.
- Pakistan is also facing several terrorist attacks from terrorist groups like Tehreek E Taliban Pakistan(TTP), ISIS-Khorasan, etc.
- TTP has been emboldened by the Taliban reoccupying Kabul.
Why Pakistan cannot be totally insulated from the world ?:
- Pakistan is referred to as a Pivot state/ or a very important state in international politics due to its location.
- It shares a very long border with Afghanistan, due to which the USA chose Pakistan as its partner in its war on terrorism.
- This was despite the fact that it was well known that the Pakistani deep state favors the Taliban.
- Pakistan also has good relations with China- the emerging superpower.
- Russia considers Pakistan as a zipper state- that connects Asia and Europe.
- Pakistan's importance was estimated to rise after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.
- Pakistan's diminished status is due to its economic turmoil.
Way Forward in India-Pakistan Relations ?:
- Build international pressure on Pakistan to stop sponsoring terrorism.
- Pakistani policy of selectively supporting and opposing is now becoming a serious domestic security issue for Pakistan.
- Internation pressure can be built by once again graylisting or even blacklisting Pakistan under the Financial Action Task Force.
- India should pursue the adoption of the CCIT- Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism by the UNO.
- India should cooperate with other countries to get international terrorists and terrorist organizations listed under the UN terrorist lists.
- It is unlikely that Pakistan is going to act strongly against the terrorist actors anytime soon.
- Therefore is it essential that India continues to develop counter-terrorism capabilities and consequent deterrence.
- India should develop good relations with countries that have leverage with Pakistan- Saudi Arabia, UAE, etc.
- India has traditionally been reluctant in dealing with the Pakistani military.
- India has recently opened challenges of communications with Rawalpindi( Pakistan Military Headquarters).
- Any agreement with it would have larger credence.
- In fact, it was the backchannel negotiations between the NSA of the two countries and their interlocutors that ended the state of the deep freeze.
- Trying to increase International communities' stake in the Indian economy.
- It will act as a safeguard against such attacks on India.
- Pursue soft power in terms of sports and cultural exchanges.
- Emphasizing more on commonalities rather than differences between the two countries.
- The two countries have shared histories and overlapping cultures.
- Pakistan cannot win if the spirit of a multicultural India is protected and promoted.
1)
Which of the following is not one of the objective of Panchsheel policy of India with respect to its Neighbours:
(a)Mutual Non agression
(b)Peaceful co-existence.
(c)Military support in case of a war.
(d) Equality and co-operation for mutual benefit
2)
| Year of the India-Pakistan War | Concluding Agreement |
| 1948 | Tashkent Agreement |
| 1965 | Karachi Agreement |
| 1971 | Shimla Agreement |
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
(a)Only one
(b)Only two
(c)All the three
(d)Nne of the above
3)
Which of the following is correct in the context of the Panchsheel Agreement with China?
1. It advocated for mutual respect for each other"s territorial integrity and sovereignty.
2. Panchsheel was accepted as the principled core of the Gujaral Doctrine
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a)1 only
(b)2 only
(c)Both 1 and 2
(d)Neither 1 nor 2
4)
Consider the following statements about the Gujaral Doctrine:
1. India will help all its land neighbors except Pakistan in good faith.
2. India will follow the principle of non-reciprocity under the doctrine.
3. India will militarily defend its neighboring countries from external invasion.
How many of the above statements are correct?
(a)Only one
(b)Only two
(c)All the three
(d)None of the above
5)
Consider the following statements:
I. Diplomatic & Political priority will be extended to the neighboring countries.
II. To provide in terms of resources for their development.
III. To facilitate connectivity to allow the free flow of goods, services, investments, and ideas.
IV. To promote a model of India-led regionalism with which the neighboring countries are comfortable.
How many of the above are the tenets of the Neighbourhood First Policy by India in 2014?
(a)Only one
(b)Only three
(c)All the four
(d)None of the four
6)
Which of the following is the most accurate description of the strategy used by pakistan when it wishes to make india bleed through a thousand cuts ?
(a)Augmenting defence and economic capacity for direct confrontation with India
(b)Engaging India in multiple low level conflicts and terror attacks rather than engaging in a full-fledged war.
(c)Inflicting economical damage to India through many spam calls to ask banking details of Indians
(d)Attacking India with low-intensity biological weapons.
7)
With which of the following agreement can we associate the Line of Control between India and Pakistan ?
(a)Nehru-Noon Agreement 1958
(b)Indus Water Treaty 1960
(c)Shimla Agreement 1972
(d)Westphalian Treaty 1648
8)
Consider the following regions:
1. Siachen
2. Aksai Chin
3. Sir Creek
4. Tawang
5. Katchatheevu Island
How many of the above regions are disputed between India and Pakistan?
(a)Only one
(b)Only two
(c)Only three
(d)Only four
9)
What is the goal of foreign policy and how Panchsheel has strengthened India’s foreign Policy? Explain. (150 words/10 marks)
10)
How feasible is the idea of isolating Pakistan from the international affairs ?(150 words/10 marks)
11)
Write short notes on - (150 words / 10 marks)
1. Gujaral Doctrine
2. Neighborhood First Policy
12)
How did the 1971 war changed the tracks of foreign policies of both India and Pakistan ?(150 words/10 marks)
13)
Elaborate how economical strength, military might and history can affect the foreign policy of any nation. (150 words/10 marks)
Answers
1) c
2) a
3) c
4) a
5) c
6) b
7) c
8) b
The ultimate goal of foreign policy is to secure a nation's interests on the global stage. This can encompass a variety of objectives, including:
- Economic Prosperity: Expanding trade, attracting investment, and securing resources.
- National Security: Deterring threats, building alliances, and maintaining a strong military.
- Global Influence: Shaping international norms, promoting values, and gaining leadership roles.
Panchsheel, India's five principles of peaceful coexistence (mutual respect for sovereignty, non-aggression, non-interference, equality and mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence), has strengthened India's foreign policy in several ways:
- Moral High Ground: Panchsheel projects India as a peace-loving nation, fostering trust and goodwill with other countries.
- Strategic Flexibility: By avoiding rigid alliances, India can engage with various powers based on its own interests.
- Soft Power: Panchsheel's emphasis on peaceful coexistence resonates with many developing nations, boosting India's global image.
However, Panchsheel's effectiveness can be debated in a world increasingly focused on power blocs. Nonetheless, it remains a cornerstone of Indian foreign policy, guiding its engagement with the world
Isolating Pakistan entirely from international affairs is highly improbable for several reasons:
- Geostrategic Location: Pakistan occupies a vital position bordering Afghanistan, Iran, China, and India. Major powers need Pakistani cooperation for regional stability and trade routes.
- Nuclear Power: As a declared nuclear state, complete isolation is a risky proposition for the international community.
- Global Issues: Pakistan contributes to discussions on global challenges like climate change and terrorism. Ignoring its perspective weakens solutions.
- Economic Interdependence: Pakistan is a significant player in the global economy. Trade and investment ties with numerous countries make isolation impractical.
- Humanitarian Concerns: With a large population, Pakistan requires international aid and cooperation for development and disaster relief.
While Pakistan might face sanctions or strained relations with some countries due to specific policies, complete isolation is unrealistic. Diplomacy and engagement, though challenging, are more effective approaches.
Write short notes on - (150 words / 10 marks)
1. Gujaral Doctrine
2. Neighborhood First Policy
1. Gujaral Doctrine: The Gujaral Doctrine, formulated by former Indian Prime Minister I.K. Gujaral, outlines India's approach to its neighbors. It emphasizes goodwill, generosity, and non-reciprocity in India's relations with its immediate neighbors. According to this doctrine, India should not expect reciprocity from its smaller neighbors but should instead proactively assist them without expecting anything in return. The doctrine prioritizes building trust, enhancing regional stability, and fostering cooperative relationships with neighboring countries. It emphasizes the importance of resolving disputes through dialogue and peaceful means while promoting regional integration and cooperation. The Gujaral Doctrine reflects India's commitment to being a responsible regional power and has influenced its foreign policy approach towards South Asia. 2. Neighborhood First Policy: The Neighborhood First Policy is a cornerstone of India's foreign policy, aiming to prioritize relations with its immediate neighbors. Envisioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, this policy underscores the significance of fostering strong, stable, and mutually beneficial ties with neighboring countries. It emphasizes cooperation in various sectors such as trade, connectivity, security, and people-to-people exchanges. The Neighborhood First Policy seeks to address shared challenges and capitalize on common opportunities for development and prosperity in the region. By enhancing connectivity, resolving disputes amicably, and extending economic assistance, India aims to create a peaceful and prosperous neighborhood conducive to its own growth and security. This policy reflects India's commitment to being a proactive and constructive player in the South Asian region.
- -------------------------------------------------------
1. Gujral Doctrine (150 words/10 marks)
The Gujral Doctrine, formulated by I.K. Gujral in 1996, aimed to improve India's relations with its South Asian neighbors. It emphasized:
- Unilateral Accommodation: India offering concessions and assistance to build trust, even without reciprocity.
- Non-interference: Respecting neighbors' internal affairs and territorial integrity.
- Peaceful Resolution: Settling disputes through bilateral talks.
The Doctrine's success is debated, but it achieved some positive outcomes like resolving the water-sharing dispute with Bangladesh.
2. Neighbourhood First Policy (150 words/10 marks)
Launched in 2014, the Neighbourhood First Policy prioritizes improving relations with India's immediate neighbors. It builds upon the Gujral Doctrine's principles and focuses on:
- Enhanced Cooperation: Collaboration in areas like trade, infrastructure, security, and culture.
- Connectivity: Promoting physical and economic connectivity through land, sea, and air corridors.
- Security: Joint efforts to combat terrorism and transnational crimes.
This policy aims to create a stable and prosperous neighborhood, furthering India's regional influence. While challenges remain, it has led to increased engagement with some neighbors.
-------------------------------------------------------
The 1971 war significantly altered the foreign policy trajectories of both India and Pakistan:
India:
- Regional Power: The decisive victory established India as the dominant military power in South Asia. This emboldened India's foreign policy, allowing it to pursue a more assertive role in the region.
- Shifting Alliances: The close cooperation with the USSR during the war strained relations with the US, which supported Pakistan. India began diversifying its alliances.
- Moral High Ground: Supporting Bangladesh's liberation struggle bolstered India's image as a champion of self-determination.
Pakistan:
- Loss of Territory: The creation of Bangladesh was a humiliating defeat, leading to a period of introspection and political instability.
- Increased Reliance on US: Pakistan sought closer ties with the US to counterbalance India's growing power, becoming more strategically aligned with the West.
- Military Focus: The defeat exposed weaknesses in Pakistan's military, leading to increased defense spending and a stronger focus on military solutions to regional issues.
The war thus created a lasting power imbalance in South Asia, with India emerging as a regional leader and Pakistan seeking external support to counter it. This continues to influence the foreign policy approaches of both nations.
Elaborate how economical strength, military might and history can affect the foreign policy of any nation. (150 words/10 marks)
Economic strength, military might, and historical context are crucial determinants that significantly influence the foreign policy of any nation.
Firstly, economic strength shapes a nation's ability to exert influence and pursue its interests globally. A strong economy enables a country to engage in trade agreements, provide aid, and attract investments, thereby enhancing its diplomatic leverage and soft power. Economic considerations often drive foreign policy decisions, such as prioritizing trade partnerships, accessing resources, or promoting economic development in other countries.
Secondly, military might is a fundamental aspect of national security and defense strategy. A powerful military can deter potential adversaries, protect territorial integrity, and project force to advance national interests. Military capabilities influence a nation's posture in international conflicts, alliances, and peacekeeping efforts, shaping its foreign policy objectives and strategies.
Lastly, historical context provides the foundation for a nation's foreign policy principles, alliances, and conflicts. Past experiences, including colonial legacies, conflicts, and alliances, shape a country's identity, perceptions of threats, and approach to international relations. Historical grievances, alliances, and rivalries often influence diplomatic engagements, territorial disputes, and strategic alignments, guiding a nation's foreign policy decisions in the present and future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A nation's foreign policy is shaped by a complex interplay of factors. Three important ones are:
For instance, a nation with a strong economy may use its financial resources to influence other countries through trade deals or foreign aid. A nation with a powerful military may use its military strength to deter aggression or to promote its interests abroad. And a nation's history may shape its foreign policy goals, such as a desire to maintain alliances or to avoid past mistakes.
These are just a few examples of how economic strength, military might, and history can affect a nation's foreign policy. The relative importance of these factors will vary from country to country, but they all play a significant role in shaping how nations interact with each other on the world stage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorist activities and mutual destruction have clouded India-Pakistan relations. Suggest solutions to deal with the challenges posed by Pakistan. (150 words/10 marks)
To address the challenges posed by Pakistan and improve India-Pakistan relations, several solutions could be considered:
1. Diplomatic Engagement: Continued diplomatic dialogue and engagement are essential to address underlying issues and build mutual trust. Consistent efforts should be made to resume bilateral talks on various contentious issues.
2. Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs): Implementing CBMs such as increased people-to-people contacts, cultural exchanges, and trade initiatives can foster goodwill and reduce tensions between the two countries.
3. Counterterrorism Cooperation: Enhancing cooperation on counterterrorism efforts, including intelligence sharing, joint operations, and extradition treaties, is crucial to combatting terrorist activities originating from Pakistan.
4. Track-II Diplomacy: Utilizing unofficial channels of communication through Track-II diplomacy can provide platforms for dialogue, fostering better understanding and cooperation between the two nations.
5. International Mediation: Involving neutral third-party mediators or international organizations to facilitate dialogue and conflict resolution can help overcome bilateral stalemates and address contentious issues.
6. Comprehensive Dialogue: Initiating a comprehensive dialogue process covering various dimensions of the relationship, including Kashmir, cross-border terrorism, and trade, can provide a framework for sustained engagement and conflict resolution.
7. Economic Cooperation: Promoting economic cooperation and regional connectivity through trade agreements and infrastructure projects can create mutual benefits, incentivizing both countries to prioritize peace and stability.
8. Bilateral Agreements: Strengthening existing bilateral agreements, such as the Lahore Declaration and the Simla Agreement, and adhering to their principles can provide a foundation for resolving disputes peacefully.
By adopting a multifaceted approach that combines diplomatic efforts, confidence-building measures, and cooperation on shared challenges, India and Pakistan can work towards building a more stable and peaceful relationship.
The complex India-Pakistan relationship has been marred by historical disputes, border tensions, and security challenges. Here are two measures that could help improve relations between the two countries:
Cultural Exchanges: Promote cultural exchanges between India and Pakistan. By fostering a sense of shared history, art, music, and literature, these exchanges can strengthen ties and create mutual understanding. Cultural interactions can bridge gaps and humanize the “other,” leading to better relations.
Diplomatic and Economic Cooperation: Both nations should work together to deepen diplomatic and economic ties. Diplomacy can address lingering geopolitical issues, while economic cooperation can benefit both countries. Trade relations, joint projects, and people-to-people connections can pave the way for stability and peace.
It is essential to recognize that most issues can be resolved through dialogue, negotiation, and cooperation rather than confrontation. The path to lasting peace lies in finding common ground and building trust
(10 marks)
Solutions to Challenges Posed by Pakistan (150 words/10 marks)
India-Pakistan relations remain complex, but addressing them is crucial. Here are some potential solutions:
- Dismantle Terror Infrastructure: Pakistan must dismantle terror groups operating within its borders and crack down on their financing.
- Actionable Ceasefire: Implement a verifiable ceasefire along the Line of Control with a clear mechanism to address violations.
- Comprehensive Dialogue: Initiate a multi-layered dialogue addressing core issues like Kashmir alongside confidence-building measures in trade, culture, and people-to-people interaction.
- International Pressure: The international community can play a role by pressurizing Pakistan to take concrete action against terror groups.
- Focus on Shared Challenges: Both nations can cooperate on issues of mutual concern like water management, climate change, and regional security.
These steps require commitment from both sides. Trust-building and addressing core issues are vital for a sustainable relationship.
0 Comments